[center]
HORRIFIED BY STORMPAY! 
[/center]
I was horrified to read the news today about Stormpay's new terms. In fact, I went through and re-read the whole user agreement. So what are the advantages of Stormpay?
1) The fee to Receive Payments: Non NetIBA Certified: 6.9% plus 69 cents per transaction.
2) The chance to lower your fee by becoming NetIBA Certified: 2.9% plus 39 cents per transaction. Of course, to certify your email address for 1 year is 19.99. (If you want to certify your auction username it's a seperate charge of 19.99/year & to certify a website domain is 19.95/year).
Thus, you have to make more than 19.99 a year + 2.9% and 39 cents per transaction before you ever actually make a profit.

-Nevermind that StormPay and NetIBA were incorporated by the SAME person. Mr. John McConnell Jr is the registered agent, the principal officer, and the customer service contact of NetIBA. This man is also the registered agent of Stormpay. For more info on this:
http://www.mystormpaylawsuit.com/. (Steven Girsky is the CEO and Customer Service contact for StormPay. I find it amusing that the Chief Executive Officer is also the customer service contact; If I was basically a one-man or 2 or 3-man business, as it sounds like StormPay might be, I wouldn't bother giving myself the title of CEO.

)
So, StormPay is basically verifying themselves and then taking 19.99 a year from you (through NetIBA) so that they
only take 2.9% plus 39 cents of your hard-earned money.

As if it's not hard enough for us to make money in this industry in the first place!
3) The chance to give your personal information and money to a random, rather suspicious company, NetIBA. Regarding NetIBA, The Better Business Bureau states: "The Bureau has requested basic information from this company. The Bureau has not received a response."

(goto the BBB website & look up NetIBA).
So this company comes out of nowhere and supposedly verifies email addresses, etc. Yet in their user agreement, "NetIBA specifically disclaims any warranty . . . v) that the security methods used in providing services will be sufficient, or (vi) regarding correctness, accuracy or reliablity of software, hardware, internet connections, or data of NetIBA."
http://www.netiba.com/about.php?view=agreement 
No warranty for security methods? That sounds to me like I wouldn't want them to have any of my personal information! If they can't guarantee their data is correct, accurate, or reliable, then their "verfication" is not any good.
I find it amusing that they state they have no competitors. What about Verisign? Compare their site to NetIBA!
http://www.verisign.com/index.html Of course, Verisign doesn't try to distract from their primary purpose of providing security by offering an affiliate program, which, by the way, the rules for it take up more than half the user agreement! - Oh and you have the benefit of only using Stormpay to provide and receive payment from NetIBA.
4) The benefit of not being able to change or delete your bank account information without emailing them. I'm assuming you just have to ask them to delete it for you and 'trust' that they do so.
5) The privledge of doing business with a company that tries to monopolize the industry by force rather than through striving to be superior. In fact, can someone explain this paragraph from their user-agreement to me (#28):
"Using more than one payment processor is exactly the situation that ?fraud? seeks out. This enables the fraudulent user to set up a fake profile with either of the processors, make a purchase or join the program, and then withdraw their earnings to the other processor where the real identity is used. This sort of activity makes it nearly impossible for either processor, or law enforcement to properly handle the fraud because the ?trail? comes to an end. This is the cause for a great many chargebacks to those merchants which can be avoided."
I really don't understand how this enables fraud. Besides which, is this even legal?

I really hope someone looks into that!
With these fabulous advantages that Stormpay brings to the table, I'm sure no one will understand why I choose Paypal over StormPay. (I mean, why would I want a processor that doesn't charge me anything to send or receive money with my personal account?)
I don't think the Paypal problem even came close to this issue. I know that some of you will disagree, having had your accounts frozen & some of you having lost money. I can totally understand why you would not want to use Paypal again. On the other hand, it seems that problem has been solved. As I am not a fan of e-gold either, there does not seem to be an easy solution.
However, I strongly urge Program Owners not to choose StormPay. They have no right to demand exclusivity or exclusion. We should not allow them to monopolize the industry. We do have a choice. Now is the time to take a stand! It won't be easy but it can be done! Whatever happens, I wish everyone the best!